ArticleVaccine2025
Humoral, T cell and immune gene expression responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a small group of children with previous MIS-C.
Article in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Post-MIS-C cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in children with previous multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) are not well understood. In this study, we aimed to assess immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in children over the age of 12 years with previous MIS-C and compare them to healthy children. Three children with previous MIS-C and four healthy children received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Blood was collected before the first dose, one week after the first dose, one week after the second dose and three weeks after the second dose. All participants had detectable SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG before vaccination. Spike binding and neutralising antibody activity increased after the first vaccine dose with no differences between children with a history of MIS-C and healthy children. Serum inflammatory cytokines and whole blood immune gene profiles did not resemble acute MIS-C and there were no differences in these between the two groups at any timepoint. All participants gained a robust SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response by three weeks after the second dose. A transient increase in SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 T cells expressing TCR Vβ21.3, a non-specific T cell subset previously found to be enriched in patients with MIS-C, was demonstrated in two of the children with previous MIS-C but none of the healthy children. Together, these data demonstrate that vaccination is effective at boosting SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses in a small group of children with previous MIS-C, and that it does not induce inflammatory cytokine or gene expression responses resembling acute MIS-C. Although larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings, the present evidence supports SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in children with previous MIS-C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.