ArticleHealth & place2025
Structural drivers of health among transgender women in the United States: A nationwide study.
Article in Health & place, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Encapsulating the burden and social determinants of self-reported general health problems among a specific sub-group of transgender women in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a mixed-methods study.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- SeCuRE Pilot Trial: A Community-Engaged HIV Status-Neutral Microeconomic Intervention in the United States.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionResidential segregation and gentrification are associated with a variety of health outcomes. However, few studies in this area have included transgender women, who experience well-documented health inequities. This analysis sought to assess the effects of racialized economic segregation and gentrification on psychological distress and self-rated health (SRH).
methods398 transgender women in the United States completed a baseline survey between June 14, 2021 and May 1, 2022 and a follow-up survey 12 months later. Neighborhood-level racialized economic advantage and gentrification were measured at the ZIP code level and categorized into tertiles. The first tertile reflected the lowest levels of these measures. Multilevel modified Poisson regression models with individual-level random intercepts and robust variance estimation, were used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted associations of racialized economic residential advantage and gentrification with serious psychological distress (Kessler-6 ≥ 13) and SRH (poor/fair vs good/very good/excellent).
resultsEthnoracial identities included 57 % White, 19 % Black, and 9 % Latine (of any race). The highest tertile of racialized economic advantage (vs the lowest) was associated with increased risk of serious psychological distress (RR = 1.28; 95 %CI = 1.02, 1.61) and higher risk of poor-to-fair SRH (RR = 1.51; 95 % CI = 1.10,2.08) in multivariable models, while gentrification showed no significant association with either outcome. DISCUSSION: These findings are consistent with prior research indicating that minoritized populations may not derive health benefits from residing in more socially and economically advantaged neighborhoods. Future research is needed to better understand the experiences of transgender women who may be exposed to transphobia in both advantaged and disadvantaged neighborhoods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.