ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
Mental Health Support for Aphasia: Insights From Psychiatrists and Psychologists.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the availability of psychological health services is pivotal in reducing the impact of mental health issues in people with aphasia (PwA).
objectiveThis study aims to investigate the insights of psychiatrists and psychologists providing mental health and neuropsychological assessment services to PwA.
methodsThe research design chosen for the qualitative study is phenomenology. The research sample is purposive and convenience sampling. Through semi-structured interviews conducted on Zoom, lasting between 16 and 50 min, insights were gathered from eight Turkish psychologists and psychiatrists experienced with PwA. Thematic analysis was employed for data analysis, and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines were followed to ensure transparency and rigour in reporting.
resultsThematic analysis of interview transcriptions revealed six themes: 'Knowledge and awareness of aphasia'; 'Accessibility, awareness and prioritisation of services'; 'Problems experienced with PwA during interactions'; 'Strategies'; 'Caregivers' and 'Training'. There are four subthemes: 'Knowledge', 'Specialised training', 'Challenges in service accessibility' and 'Family and professional awareness'.
conclusionThis study emphasises the necessity of comprehensive training in aphasia and highlights the importance of addressing the psychological well-being of PwA. Failure to consider mental health issues in interventions may hinder recovery. Further research is recommended to raise awareness and highlights the crucial need for mental health services in the context of aphasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.