Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40618393›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental dental research2025

Glossary of Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery and Related Terms. First Edition.

Adrià Jorba-Garcia, Alessandro Pozzi, Zhuofan Chen, James Chow, Romain Doliveux, Yiu Yan Leung, Katsuhiro Maruo, Atiphan Pimkhaokham, Sofya Sadilina, Adam Siu and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dual-Hybrid Treatment Approach for Peri-Implant Hard and Soft Tissue Stability.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and Perspectives.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025
    Review
  17. Beyond Accuracy: Clinical Outcomes of Computer Assisted Implant Surgery.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Adrià Jorba-GarciaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2369-0326
Alessandro PozziDepartment of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Zhuofan ChenSun Yat-sen University, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology.
James ChowDental Implant Surgery Centre, Hong Kong-SAR, China.
Romain DoliveuxPrivate Practice, Mulhouse, France.
Yiu Yan LeungOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong.
Katsuhiro MaruoDivision of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Oral Function and Restoration, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka, Japan.
Atiphan PimkhaokhamOral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Digital Implant Surgery Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0170-243X
Sofya SadilinaClinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Adam SiuDental Implant Surgery Centre, Hong Kong-SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8601-3635
Kay VietorPrivate Practice, Langen, Germany.
Feng WangOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong.
Yiqun WuDepartment of Implantology, Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Man YiState key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Bilal Al-NawasDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Nikos MattheosOral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Digital Implant Surgery Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7358-7496
ITI Network on CAIS

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this study.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) and the respective research and clinical applications have necessitated a standardization of the terminology related not only to different devices, but also the different steps involved, surgical and presurgical procedures. The present glossary was introduced at the 1st International Team for Implantology Symposium on Computer-assisted Implant Surgery, based on the collective work of clinicians and researchers with deep understanding and experience in these technologies. The glossary was further refined and revised through the structured input of a large group of global experts within clinical application, research, and education of CAIS. The glossary includes 98 terms organized in 5 domains, aiming to clarify ambiguity and propose some standard nomenclature in the service of clinical practice, research but also development of new devices, protocols, and approaches.

Indexed as

Dental Implantation, EndosseousSurgery, Computer-AssistedTerminology as TopicHumanscomputer‐assisted implant surgerydigital dentistryguided surgeryimplantology

Identifiers

PMID40618393
PMCPMC12229244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.