ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Countermovement jump performance after metabolically, but not mechanically demanding exercise: limited sensitivity to prolonged low-frequency force depression.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Force-time metric responses to training in an Olympic 400m sprinter across a two-week microcycle: a case study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationalePrevious studies indicate that countermovement jump (CMJ) parameters may reflect neuromuscular fatigue following exhaustive exercise. However, changes in CMJ performance in response to non-muscle damaging exercise, and its relation to prolonged low-frequency force depression (PLFFD) is yet unknown. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between PLFFD and CMJ test parameters following exhaustive cycling exercise to task failure.
methodsA sample of 11 recreationally active adults completed an incremental cycling protocol to task failure. CMJ performance, low-frequency (10 Hz) force, and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force output were assessed at baseline (pre-exercise), immediately after task failure (0 min), and at 8 min, 15 min, 60 min, 24 h, and 48 h post-task failure. PLFFD was assessed as the ratio of 10 Hz to MVC force.
resultsCompared to baseline, PLFFD was larger from 0 min (7.4%) to 60-min (6.7%, p < 0.002). In contrast, no substantial changes in CMJ parameters were observed, except for a reduced concentric impulse (ConImp) lasting 8 min post-exercise.
conclusionThe results show that CMJ parameters remain unchanged following non-eccentrically loaded exhaustive exercise, while PLFFD is significantly higher for up to 60 min post-exercise. This raises questions about the utility of CMJ as a fatigue assessment tool in athletic populations. This suggests that CMJ testing may not effectively detect the presence of PLFFD following non-muscle damaging exercise and future research should explore alternative measures for monitoring neuromuscular fatigue in training contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40618319What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.