ArticleJournal of breast cancer2025
Efficacy of a Real-Time Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound System With Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis for Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Journal of breast cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Management in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: From Diagnosis to De-Escalation.Cancers · 2026Review
- Effect of an annotation-free artificial intelligence system for simultaneous detection and diagnosis on breast ultrasonography: a multireader, multicase study across diverse healthcare professionals.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Effect of a Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Ultrasound System on BI-RADS C4 Breast Lesions Based on Breast Density.Cancers · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in medicine: a position paper by the Italian Society of Internal Medicine.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted breast ultrasound: modest AUROC improvement and shorter interpretation time without significant change in diagnostic accuracy.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing artificial intelligence (AI) breast ultrasound solutions have limitations owing to their non-real-time detection and server dependency. However, novel real-time AI solutions enable on-device detection and differential diagnosis, aiding immediate decision-making. This study evaluated the feasibility of real-time artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection/diagnosis (AI-CAD) for breast ultrasound in a clinical setting and assessed its preliminary efficacy in comparison with expert evaluations. A feasibility study was conducted from August to December 2023 at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan using a real-time AI solution (CadAI-B for Breast cancer). AI-CAD runs on a tablet PC and streams the display output from the ultrasound vendor's device via HDMI or DVI. Real-time AI-CAD was evaluated for detection and diagnostic performance based on sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). The analysis included 33 patients with 14 malignancies, 17 benign lesions, and 2 normal cases; 30 (90.9%) underwent biopsy. AI-CAD successfully identified all malignancies in real-time. As AUCs were calculated using the malignancy score and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), the overall diagnostic performances were 0.835 and 0.850, respectively. The per-patient sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% and 52.6%, respectively. The BI-RADS distribution was the same between AI-CAD and experts in malignant cases. In benign cases, AI-CAD categorized nine (50.0%) as C4A or C4B, whereas experts classified 13 (72.2%), indicating the potential to reduce the need for biopsy. Real-time AI-CAD is feasible for supporting detection during breast ultrasound scanning, with potential efficacy in aiding differential diagnosis and reducing the risk of unnecessary biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.