ArticleBMC oral health2025
Exploiting the power of stepwise intraoperative irrigant activation to maximize oval canal disinfection: an ex-vivo investigation.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative in vitro evaluation of sonic, passive ultrasonic, and Er: YAG laser-activated irrigation on Enterococcus faecalis reduction and smear layer/debris removal in root canals.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Influence of repeated cycles of full-strength sodium hypochlorite activation on the mechanical behavior of root canal-treated teeth: a laboratory study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The effect of the flat-side in an engine-driven full-sequence file system on root Canal disinfection: a preliminary ex vivo investigation.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the antibacterial effectiveness of stepwise intraoperative activation of the root canal irrigant, both alone and when combined with conventional ultrasonic activation, compared to the traditional syringe irrigation method in oval root canals.
methodsSixty single-rooted maxillary second premolars were selected according to specific criteria. After creating an access opening and root canal patency in all samples, a cycle of autoclave sterilization was conducted. Enterococcus faecalis suspension was inoculated into the root canals and incubated at 37 °C for 21 days. After bacterial contamination, the specimens were assigned to four experimental groups (n = 10 per group): conventional syringe irrigation (CSI); stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA), consisting of the ultrasonic activation of 2 mL of 5.25% NaOCl solution for 20 s following irrigation between instrumentation files; conventional ultrasonic irrigation (CUI), consisting of the passive intermittent ultrasonic activation of 2 mL of 5.25% NaOCl in three successive cycles of 20 s each at the end of the mechanical instrumentation; and stepwise intraoperative activation plus conventional ultrasonic irrigation (SIA + CUI), consisting of a combination of SIA and CUI; in addition to positive control; and negative control groups (n = 10). At the end of the chemo-mechanical preparation, a bacterial sampling was conducted to determine the number of colony-forming units per mL (CFU//mL), and the outcomes were compared with one-way ANOVA and Games-Howell post hoc test with the significance level set at 5%.
resultsNone of the tested irrigation protocols were able to fully eliminate the intracanal bacterial infection. However, all protocols succeeded in reducing the bacterial burden within the oval root canals considerably (p <.05). The combination of SIA and CUI achieved the greatest bacterial reduction (1.85 ± 0.99), followed by the CUI (3.00 ± 0.13), SIA (3.54 ± 0.26), and CSI (4.29 ± 0.16) groups, respectively, with significant differences between them (p <.05).
conclusionsStepwise intraoperative irrigant activation was able to reduce the bacterial load in the oval root canals significantly compared to the basic chemo-mechanical preparation, with maximal disinfection achieved when combined with conventional ultrasonic irrigation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The complex morphology of oval root canals presents significant challenges for effective disinfection during root canal treatment. To optimize the disinfection process, it would be essential to implement supplementary techniques in conjunction with standard root canal preparation. Employing a stepwise intraoperative irrigation activation method can enhance disinfection efficacy in these convoluted anatomies, particularly when integrated with traditional ultrasonic irrigation, potentially leading to improved treatment outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Non-applicable. Conducting the current experiment was limited to the approval of the local Research Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Egypt (Committee No. 105, registration No. 903).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.