ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Proximal lateral entry technique for the treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children and intraoperative nerve protection: a novel technique.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Force-sensing drill-through detection and automatic stopping in a porcine distal humerus model simulating pediatric supracondylar pinning.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the clinical outcomes of the proximal lateral-entry pinning technique in the treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures and to explore its performance in terms of intraoperative nerve protection.
methodsThis retrospective analysis involved data from pediatric patients with supracondylar humeral fractures who were admitted to the Department of Pediatric Surgery at Binzhou Medical University Hospital between September 2017 and November 2023. A total of 342 patients were included and divided into two groups: Group P (proximal lateral-entry pinning) and Group C (conventional lateral condyle pinning). All patients were followed up for at least 6 months postoperatively. Baseline characteristics, the interval from injury to surgery, the operative time, the fracture healing status, and the timing of Kirschner wire removal were recorded. Elbow function was assessed using Flynn's functional and cosmetic criteria. Statistical comparisons were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, independent samples t-test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Complications such as loss of reduction, elbow deformity, vascular injury, iatrogenic nerve injury, and pin-tract infection were also documented.
resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in sex, body weight, age at injury, fracture laterality, anesthesia type, or waiting time from injury to surgery between the two groups (P > 0.05). Additionally, the operative time and timing of Kirschner wire removal did not differ significantly between the groups (P > 0.05). At the final follow-up, the proportion of patients with excellent/good elbow function in Group P was 99.42%, which was significantly greater than the proportion of 94.64% observed in Group C (P < 0.05). No radial or ulnar nerve injuries were reported in either group. Three cases of pin-tract infection occurred in Group P, and seven cases occurred in Group C (P > 0.05). Loss of reduction occurred in three cases in Group P and11 in Group C (P > 0.05). No incidences of elbow deformity or iatrogenic vascular injury were noted.
conclusionThe proximal lateral-entry pinning technique yields favorable fracture outcomes and does not increase the risk of radial or ulnar nerve injury when it is performed meticulously. This approach is therefore recommended as a viable surgical technique for treating supracondylar humeral fractures in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.