Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40618117›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Leptospira Hardjo among commercial dairy cattle farms of Rupandehi district, Nepal.

Tulsi Ram Gompo, Sudiksha Pandit, Deepak Subedi, Ram Chandra Sapkota, Aditi Pandey, Rojina Nepal, Ananda Tiwari, Sumit Jyoti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tulsi Ram GompoCentral Veterinary Laboratory, Department of Livestock Services, Tripureswor, Kathmandu, 46000, Nepal.
Sudiksha PanditPaklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Paklihawa, Nepal.
Deepak SubediPaklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Paklihawa, Nepal.
Ram Chandra SapkotaCentral Veterinary Laboratory, Department of Livestock Services, Tripureswor, Kathmandu, 46000, Nepal.
Aditi PandeyPaklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Paklihawa, Nepal.
Rojina NepalPaklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Paklihawa, Nepal.
Ananda TiwariDepartment of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00014, Finland. ananda.tiwari@helsinki.fi.
Sumit JyotiPaklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Paklihawa, Nepal. sujy12@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNepal relies on an agrarian-based economy, with the livestock sector contributing significantly to the national GDP. However, diseases like leptospirosis negatively impact cattle production and pose significant zoonotic risks. This study represents the first attempt to evaluate the risk factors of leptospirosis in cattle in Nepal. A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2019 to April 2020 in 14 administrative units of the Rupandehi district. A total of 367 blood samples were collected from 206 cattle farms using a proportionate sampling procedure. An indirect ELISA was used to detect specific antibodies in serum samples against Leptospira interrogans serovar Hardjo. Farm management practices and knowledge of zoonotic diseases were assessed through interviews with animal owners from the 206 cattle farms. Regression analyses were conducted to analyze the herd and farm level risk factors.

resultsThe overall farm-level seroprevalence of leptospirosis was 4.85% (95% CI: 2.35-8.75), while the animal-level seroprevalence was 3.81% (95% CI: 2.10-6.30). Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, we found that farms with purchased cattle (farms that regularly introduce cattle from other farms) had a borderline significant increase in odds of leptospirosis (OR: 7.25, 95% CI: 0.88-59.46, p = 0.065) compared to farms that only keep home-bred cattle. Additionally, larger farms (> 10 animals) were significantly associated with increased odds of leptospirosis (OR: 13.34, 95% CI: 1.64-108.42, p = 0.015) compared to smaller farms (≤ 10 animals). At the animal level, no statistically significant difference was observed in the multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model, which included farm as a random effect.

conclusionThe detection of farms with positive serum samples highlights the persistent threat of leptospirosis to cattle production and its occupational hazards within Nepal's dairy sector. Farm-level risk factors, such farms with purchased cattle and larger farm sizes, emphasize the need for targeted control measures. Given the zoonotic nature of the disease and its ecological complexity involving multiple hosts, a One Health approach is essential. Collaborative efforts among stakeholders are needed to develop evidence-based policies, strengthen health system preparedness, and implement practical interventions that reduce transmission risks and the overall disease burden in both human and animal populations across the country.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesLeptospira interrogansLeptospirosisAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialCattleCross-Sectional StudiesDairyingFemaleLeptospiraNepalRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, BacterialDairy cattleHardjoLeptospirosisNepalOccupational hazardRisk factorsZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID40618117
PMCPMC12228320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.