ArticleBMC nursing2025
Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the MISSCARE survey OR - Swedish version.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMissing nursing care in the perioperative context affects quality of care and patient safety. More validated language versions of the MISSCARE Survey OR enable local, national, and international comparisons. The aim was to translate and culturally adapt the American MISSCARE Survey OR to the Swedish perioperative context and assess the instrument's psychometric properties.
methodsA cross-sectional validation study with translation and cultural adaptation was conducted in eight steps according to the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines. To assess the psychometric properties, data were collected via a web survey distributed at a Swedish national conference for operating room nurses. The data collection was concluded in November 2023. Acceptability, construct validity and internal consistency were analyzed.
resultsCultural adaptation resulted in the omission of two items from the section measuring missed elements of care. A total of 107 (out of 261 invited operating room nurses) respondents were included in the psychometric testing, leading to a response rate of 41%. Acceptability was high, and 95.3% of the respondents answered all the items. The factor analysis on missed elements of care was inconclusive and was therefore regarded as a list of nursing actions. With respect to reasons for missed nursing care, the factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution, which explained a cumulative variance of 62.6%. The alpha coefficients for internal consistency for the three factors ranged from 0.760 to 0.947.
conclusionsThe Swedish MISSCARE Survey OR is a valid instrument with sufficient psychometric properties and provides a reliable measure of missed nursing care and its reasons. Usage could be valuable for nursing managers and directors, who are responsible for care processes and strategic care planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.