Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40618102›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Has the pandemic exacerbated sedentary behavior in children? Factors associated with high screen time in schoolchildren during COVID- 19.

Erica Costa Rodrigues, Laudicéia Ferreira Fróis, Natália de Freitas Tavares, Priscila Pena Camargo, Raquel de Deus Mendonça, Adriana Lúcia Meireles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erica Costa RodriguesPostgraduate Program in Health and Nutrition, School of Nutrition, Federal University of OuroPreto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil. erica.costa@aluno.ufop.edu.br.
Laudicéia Ferreira FróisPostgraduate Program in Health and Nutrition, School of Nutrition, Federal University of OuroPreto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Natália de Freitas TavaresGraduation and Nutrition, School of Nutrition, Federal University of OuroPreto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Priscila Pena CamargoPostgraduate Program in Health and Nutrition, School of Nutrition, Federal University of OuroPreto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Raquel de Deus MendonçaResearch and Study Group On Nutrition and Public Health (GPENSC), Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Brazil.
Adriana Lúcia MeirelesResearch and Study Group On Nutrition and Public Health (GPENSC), Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur objective was to describe changes in screen time behavior among students before and during the suspension of in-person classes in public schools due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to identify factors associated with screen time during the pandemic.

methodsCross-sectional study, conducted by telephone survey with 591 student/guardian pairs, from two municipalities in Minas Gerais, Brazil, between June and July 2020. Demographic and socioeconomic data were collected, and screen time, measured in hours and converted to minutes. Wilcoxon test for paired samples compared screen time median before and after the pandemic's onset. Linear regression models with hierarchical input were used to estimate the associations between screen time and sociodemographic and pandemic-related variables, adjusted for sex and age.

resultsStudent daily median screen time increased by 150%, from 120 min before to 300 min after the pandemic (p < 0.001). Male students were associated with an average increase of 11 min in screen time [95% CI: 7.59; 14.40]. Students from urban areas had 65.05 more minutes [95% CI: 60.91; 69.18] of screen time compared to those from rural areas. Family income and receipt of emergency aid significantly influenced screen time, with increases of 20 min [95% CI: 14.47; 26.56] and 28 min [95% CI: 24.81; 32.07], respectively. The screen time of guardians also proved to be a strong predictor, with an additional increase of 54 min [95% CI: 50.14; 58.07].

conclusionThese findings reinforce the influence of sociodemographic and behavioral factors on the increase in students' screen time during the pandemic, highlighting the importance of variables such as household income, home environment, and guardians' behavior in young people's digital exposure.

Indexed as

COVID-19Screen TimeSedentary BehaviorStudentsAdolescentBrazilChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2SchoolsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID- 19Digital exposurePublic SchoolsScreen TimeStudents

Identifiers

PMID40618102
PMCPMC12228202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.