ArticleVirology journal2025
Dynamic adaptation mutations and pathogenic characterization of a mouse-adapted seasonal human H3N2 influenza virus.
Article in Virology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundH3N2 influenza A viruses [A(H3N2)] circulate as seasonal influenza in humans worldwide, resulting in a huge disease burden. Adaptation study of A(H3N2) in mice could provide a basis for preclinical evaluation of antivirals and vaccines targeting A(H3N2) and identify the genetic markers responsible for the viral adaptation, replication, and pathogenesis.
methodsLung-to-lung passaging of wild-type (WT) A(H3N2) strain was performed in C57BL/6J mice. Amino acid (AA) mutations occurred during the passaging and temporal dynamics of these mutations were identified using the next-generation sequencing. We determined the polymerase activity of the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex containing mutation genes and compared the pathogenicity between the mouse-adapted (MA) and A(H3N2)-WT strains based on body weight change, survival rate, lung index, lung viral load, and lung pathology of the infected mice.
resultsThe A(H3N2)-MA strain was obtained after seventeen lung-to-lung passages in mice. 14 AA mutations in the PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NP, and M1 genes were identified in the A(H3N2)-MA strain compared to the A(H3N2)-WT strain. In addition, the polymerase activity of the RNP complex containing mutation genes was increased, and the pathogenicity of the MA virus is significantly higher than that of the WT strain.
conclusionsOne A(H3N2)-MA strain has been developed that can infect and kill mice. The MA strain showed stronger replication ability and pathogenicity than the A(H3N2)-WT strain. This A(H3N2)-MA model provides a valuable basis for evaluating the effects of drugs and vaccines and for studying pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.