ArticleBMC women's health2025
Navigating treatment options: a qualitative study exploring Australian women's decision-making experiences and satisfaction with treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA wide range of management options exist for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Australian clinical standards emphasise the need for shared decision-making to ensure women receive comprehensive, reliable information about their options. However, the high variation in the usage of treatments, such as hysterectomy and endometrial ablation, across Australia suggests inconsistent access to quality care. This study aims to gain insights into Australian women's perceptions of current practices, their experiences of HMB care and treatment decision-making.
methodsA qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with Australian women who sought treatment for HMB within the past two years. Women were recruited via social media advertising. The interviews took place online between July and September 2024. Women were asked about (1) their experiences with HMB, (2) their interactions with clinicians (3) experiences of shared decision making and (4) what other resources they consulted in their treatment decision-making. Transcribed audio recordings were analysed thematically using Framework analysis.
resultsTwenty-four participants between the ages of 35 and 55 were interviewed. Five main themes emerged: "Why Women Seek Treatment", "Efforts and Obstacles in Securing Quality Care", "Women's Perceptions of Their Treatment Options", "The Role of Clinicians in Treatment Decision-making" and "Women consult various sources of information to make treatment decisions".
conclusionsAustralian women face significant barriers in accessing quality care and appropriate effective treatment for HMB. Women are often uncertain about what is considered a normal menstrual experience and receive inadequate information from clinicians. Women seek balanced, comprehensive information on all available treatment options and clear guidance on how treatment success is monitored. Tools that support shared decision-making have been identified as a potential method to improve HMB treatment journeys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.