Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40618057›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2025

#diastasisrecti: a mixed-methods analysis of Instagram posts and their influence on women's exercise and sports participation.

Silvia Giagio, Tamara Rial-Rebullido, Stefano Salvioli, Tiziano Innocenti, Paolo Pillastrini, Isabel Moore, Gráinne Donnelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silvia GiagioDivision of Occupational Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. silviagiagioft@gmail.com.
Tamara Rial-RebullidoDepartment of Health and Physical Education, West Long Branch, University of Monmouth, New Jersey, USA.
Stefano SalvioliDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Savona, Italy.
Tiziano InnocentiGIMBE Foundation, Bologna, Italy.
Paolo PillastriniDivision of Occupational Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Isabel MooreCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Gráinne DonnellyCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging literature indicates that women increasingly turn to social media for medical information, including on diastasis recti abdominis (DRA). However, the quality of this information remains unclear. This study evaluated Instagram (IG) content related to DRA, exercise, and sports, and explored its perceived impact on the behaviours of women with DRA.

methodsA convergent parallel mixed methods design was used. Public IG posts were analysed using the QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST) and exercise and sports suggestions for women with DRA were extracted. A global survey and semi-structured interviews with women diagnosed with DRA explored their IG experiences and its impact on exercise and sports participation. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed.

resultsAmong the 1,000 posts screened, 28 were included. The majority (61%, n = 17) provided non-evidence-based suggestions; only 7.1% (n = 2) mentioned a scientific source. QUEST scores highlighted poor information quality. Twenty women with DRA participated in the interviews, from which six themes emerged: (1) Navigating DRA information; (2) Contrasting perceptions of DRA, exercise, and sports content on IG; (3) Disparities in exercise and sports suggestions on IG; (4) The influence of IG content on exercise and sports participation: a range from fear and avoidance to empowerment; (5) Beyond IG: information on DRA, exercise, and sports; (6) How women select and evaluate their information sources. Suggestions supported by literature positively influenced the lives of 20% of women (n = 4). Conversely, women reported experiencing confusion, misinformation, and nocebo effects due to assertive, non-evidence-based content. Both quantitative and qualitative findings highlighted the presence of prescriptive do/do not exercise and sports lists.

conclusionsIG plays a complex role in disseminating health information about DRA, exercise, and sports, offering valuable support, but can also pose significant risks of misinformation. Collaboration among healthcare and fitness professionals, and researchers is essential to enhance the accuracy and reliability of information on social media, thereby improving overall health outcomes and sports engagement.

Indexed as

ExerciseSocial MediaSportsAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesDiastasis recti abdominisDigital healthSocial mediaSports medicineWomen

Identifiers

PMID40618057
PMCPMC12229008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.