ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Wristful thinking: exploring the effects of robotic rehabilitation and cross-education for persons with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Wristful thinking: exploring the effects of robotic rehabilitation and cross-education for persons with multiple sclerosis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of this work was to develop an adaptive rehabilitation technique using a haptic wrist robot that would induce cross-education to an untrained limb. Fourteen individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and eight non-affected adults completed an eight-week intervention. MS participants were placed into two groups, training their more affected limb (direct training), and training their less affected limb (indirect training). The purpose of the intervention was to improve wrist and grip strength (measured via maximal grip and isometric wrist strength) and motor control (measured via robotic assessments). Participants trained with the robotic device three times per week for eight consecutive weeks. Training consisted of eccentric contractions as the participant resisted a force elicited from the robotic device as it moved in flexion, extension, and radial-ulnar deviation. The MS group reported significant increases in wrist strength. The indirect training group significantly improved in flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation in the trained limb, and flexion and radial deviation in the untrained limb. The direct training group showed improvements in extension and ulnar deviation in both limbs. The control group improved in radial and ulnar deviation, with radial deviation improving in the untrained limb. Grip force remained unchanged for all groups. MS participants significantly decreased tracking and figural error post-intervention suggesting evidence that motor control adaptations occurred following an adaptive and resistive robotic intervention of the upper limb. Results of this work provide evidence that eight-week robotic rehabilitation can elicit cross-education effects to the untrained limb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.