ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
A systematic review of machine learning approaches in cochlear implant outcomes.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Personalizing Cochlear Implant Care in Single-Sided Deafness: A Distinct Paradigm from Bilateral Hearing Loss.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) have transformed the lives of over one million individuals with hearing impairment, including children as young as nine months. This systematic review critically examines the current literature on the application of machine learning (ML) techniques for predicting CI outcomes. A comprehensive search identified 20 relevant studies. Imaging-based studies demonstrated high predictive accuracy for language and speech perception outcomes. Neural function measures provided a feasible way to assess the functional status of the auditory nerve, while clinical and audiological predictors were extensively explored through data mining techniques. Additionally, ML-based speech enhancement algorithms showed promise in improving speech recognition in noisy environments, a major challenge for CI users. Despite these advancements, a significant gap remains in developing models that can be directly integrated into CI programming. Integrating ML into CIs- in areas like signal processing and device programming-holds immense potential to support personalized patient care for hearing-impaired individuals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.