ArticleScientific reports2025
Long term patterns and risk factors of loneliness in young adults from an 18-Year longitudinal study in Germany.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying patterns and predictors of social health in adolescence using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.Developmental psychology · 2026Article
- Community music activity participation and loneliness among Chinese young adults living alone.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preventing loneliness is a significant goal due to its association with long-term negative effects on both mental and physical health. This German longitudinal study used three assessment points to examine predictors of emotional loneliness-defined as the absence of close, trusting relationships-in young adulthood (T3: age 22), based on factors assessed in early childhood (T1: age 4) and adolescence (T2: age 14). Utilizing data from 224 families, regression models were employed to identify child and parent risk factors-such as child and parent mental health problems, parent dysfunctional parenting, child adverse childhood experiences, child problematic internet use, and child experiences of school bullying-to predict child emotional loneliness. Emotional loneliness was measured through self-reports by adolescents/young adults and external reports provided by parents. Over 25% of adolescents reported emotional loneliness, a figure that increased to 50% in young adulthood during the pandemic. Experiencing loneliness in adolescence was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of feeling lonely again in emerging adulthood. Parents tend to underestimate their children's feelings of loneliness. Lower levels of childhood externalizing mental health problems and higher levels of maternal dysfunctional parenting were associated with an increased likelihood of loneliness in adolescence. Only adolescent mental health problems predicted loneliness in emerging adulthood. Additionally, more adverse childhood experiences and higher levels of compulsive internet use during adolescence were linked to more adolescent mental health problems, identifying potential indirect targets for the prevention of loneliness. In contrast, paternal factors did not significantly contribute to the prediction of emotional loneliness in this sample. Effective strategies may include enhancing parenting practices and increasing awareness of child mental health problems, mitigating adverse childhood experiences, and reducing excessive internet use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.