ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
Unsupervised detection of rare events in liquid biopsy assays.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.Research square · 2026Article
- Enhancing breast cancer detection with AI for early diagnosis and recurrence prediction.Oncoscience · 2026Review
- Representation learning enables robust single cell phenotyping in whole slide liquid biopsy imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of liquid biopsies in the detection, diagnosis and treatment monitoring of different types of cancers and other diseases often requires identifying and enumerating instances of analytes that are rare. Most current techniques that aim to computationally isolate these rare instances or events first learn the signature of the event, and then scan the appropriate biological assay for this signature. While such techniques have proven to be very useful, they are limited because they must first establish what signature to look for, and only then identify events that are consistent with this signature. In contrast to this, in this study, we present an automated approach that does not require the knowledge of the signature of the rare event. It works by breaking the assay into a sequence of components, learning the probability distribution of these components, and then isolating those that are rare. This is done with the help of deep generative algorithms in an unsupervised manner, meaning without a-priori knowledge of the rare event associated with an analyte. In this study, this approach is applied to immunofluorescence microscopy images of peripheral blood, where it is shown that it successfully isolates biologically relevant events in blood from normal donors spiked with cancer-related cells and in blood from patients with late-stage breast cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.