ArticleScientific reports2025
Parametric optimization of the slot waveguide characteristics using a machine-learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Slot waveguides provide high electric field amplitude and optical power in low-index materials that are not possible with conventional waveguides. This specific property of the slot waveguide provides interaction between active material and electric field, which led to many interesting applications, such as optical amplification, optical switching, and optical detection in integrated photonics. In the present work, we combine machine learning (ML) algorithms and finite element simulation to predict the power confinement ([Formula: see text]) and mode effective index ([Formula: see text]) of slot waveguides with respect to geometric parameters such as gap, slab width, and slab height. Three different ML techniques, such as artificial neural network (ANN), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest (RF), were tested to compute performance parameters for the slot waveguide. The RF method outperformed the other two with mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination ([Formula: see text]), and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values corresponding [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] as 0.007, 0.054, 0.961, and 0.960, and 0.129, 0.185, 0.998, and 0.998, respectively. Thus, providing a useful ML methodology for efficient optimization of slot waveguide structures for future applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.