ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating the effects of plasma-activated water on E. coli with the novel application of single-cell impedance flow cytometry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell impedance flow cytometry (IFC) is a rapid, label-free diagnostic capable of resolving the dielectric properties of individual cells. Here, single-cell IFC is employed to investigate the effects of plasma-activated water (PAW) on E. coli. This diagnostic makes use of the frequency-dependent dielectric response of cells. By recording the dielectric spectra of E. coli, the subcellular dielectric properties can be estimated. Following exposure to PAW, significant shifts in the phase angle of the impedance of E. coli were observed compared to untreated populations. The phase shift increased with frequency and when cells were exposed to PAW with higher concentrations of reactive species. A reduction in the amplitude of the impedance signal was also noted, corresponding to a decrease in cell volume. After signal calibration with stationary-phase E. coli and a three-shell dielectric model, a sensitivity analysis and genetic algorithm were used to find the relevant subcellular dielectric parameters. The results show that the conductivity of the outer membrane, periplasm, and cytoplasm change considerably in response to PAW treatment. This indicates that PAW modifies multiple layers of the cell simultaneously and that the inactivation pathway of PAW-treated E. coli is likely not confined to a single subcellular layer. For the first time, this study demonstrates that single-cell IFC can extract meaningful and detailed information about the cellular response to plasma treatment in an efficient and label-free manner. This establishes it as a promising diagnostic for uncovering the mechanisms of a variety of biological applications of low-temperature plasmas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.