Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40617930›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Explainable artificial intelligence driven insights into smoking prediction using machine learning and clinical parameters.

S Aishwarya, P C Siddalingaswamy, Krishnaraj Chadaga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S AishwaryaManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
P C SiddalingaswamyManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. pcs.swamy@manipal.edu.
Krishnaraj ChadagaManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. krishnaraj.chadaga@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoking is a leading cause of various health conditions, including cancer and respiratory diseases. Smokers often face medical restrictions such as limitations in blood and organ donation, reduced effectiveness of medications, and increased surgical complications. These impacts underscore the need for early detection of smoking status to enable timely intervention. This study explores the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques to predict smoking status based on health parameters, including biosignals and clinical biomarkers. A balanced subset of 2,000 instances was sampled from a publicly available Kaggle dataset comprising clinical and biometric features. Multiple ML models were implemented, including Random Forest Classifier, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors, CatBoost Classifier, and an Artificial Neural Network. The Random Forest Classifier achieved the better performance with an accuracy of 0.80, precision of 0.80, recall of 0.80, and F1-score of 0.79. To enhance model interpretability, four Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques were applied: Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), QLattice, and Anchor. SHAP identified hemoglobin as the most influential predictor, while LIME, QLattice, and Anchor highlighted the role of gamma-glutamyl transferase (t). Interactions between hemoglobin, GTP, and height were associated with more accurate predictions. The integration of ensemble modeling and multiple XAI approaches offers deeper interpretability than prior studies, providing healthcare providers and policymakers with a robust, transparent decision-support tool for targeted intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningSmokingBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsData AnalyticsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestArtificial intelligenceHealth parametersMachine learningSmokers detectionXAI

Identifiers

PMID40617930
PMCPMC12228788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.