ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable artificial intelligence driven insights into smoking prediction using machine learning and clinical parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable nomogram with SHAP analysis predicts thrombotic failure of forearm arteriovenous fistulas.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- An Innovative Approach for Extraction of Smoking Addiction Levels Using Physiological Parameters Based on Machine Learning: Proof of Concept.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smoking is a leading cause of various health conditions, including cancer and respiratory diseases. Smokers often face medical restrictions such as limitations in blood and organ donation, reduced effectiveness of medications, and increased surgical complications. These impacts underscore the need for early detection of smoking status to enable timely intervention. This study explores the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques to predict smoking status based on health parameters, including biosignals and clinical biomarkers. A balanced subset of 2,000 instances was sampled from a publicly available Kaggle dataset comprising clinical and biometric features. Multiple ML models were implemented, including Random Forest Classifier, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors, CatBoost Classifier, and an Artificial Neural Network. The Random Forest Classifier achieved the better performance with an accuracy of 0.80, precision of 0.80, recall of 0.80, and F1-score of 0.79. To enhance model interpretability, four Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques were applied: Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), QLattice, and Anchor. SHAP identified hemoglobin as the most influential predictor, while LIME, QLattice, and Anchor highlighted the role of gamma-glutamyl transferase (t). Interactions between hemoglobin, GTP, and height were associated with more accurate predictions. The integration of ensemble modeling and multiple XAI approaches offers deeper interpretability than prior studies, providing healthcare providers and policymakers with a robust, transparent decision-support tool for targeted intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.