Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40617929›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Fouling release coatings reduce colonisation of coral seeding devices.

Jose Montalvo-Proano, Florita Flores, Andrea Severati, Andrew P Negri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jose Montalvo-ProanoAustralian Institute of Marine Science, PMB No.3, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia. j.montalvoproano@aims.gov.au.
Florita FloresAustralian Institute of Marine Science, PMB No.3, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia.
Andrea SeveratiAustralian Institute of Marine Science, PMB No.3, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia.
Andrew P NegriAustralian Institute of Marine Science, PMB No.3, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing frequency and severity of coral bleaching underscores the need for effective coral reef restoration programs. These initiatives include deploying coral fragments or early recruits (spat), with large-scale coral seeding success dependent on improving coral survival by minimizing competition from algae and benthic invertebrates. This study presents a proof-of-concept field experiment assessing the effectiveness of two commercial non-biocidal fouling release coatings (FRCs) and an FRC wax coating in reducing fouling on coral seeding devices. Ceramic devices treated with FRCs were deployed with Acropora millepora microfragments and monitored over 46 weeks. Coated devices experienced significantly less fouling than uncoated controls, particularly during the critical early months when coral spat are most vulnerable. The best performing coating maintained over 10 times more clear surface area than uncoated devices, providing sustained protection without affecting coral survival. Corals also successfully overgrow the coatings by trial's end. These findings suggest that FRCs could protect smaller coral spat from overgrowth, reducing early mortality until they reach a size escape threshold. Such coatings also hold promise for large-scale restoration projects, coral nurseries, and aquaculture. Future research should evaluate their efficacy across diverse habitats, particularly areas with high macroalgal cover, to optimize their application in restoration strategies.

Indexed as

AnthozoaBiofoulingCoral ReefsAnimalsAntifoulantAntifoulingCompetitionCoral reefCoral restorationGreat Barrier ReefRecruit

Identifiers

PMID40617929
PMCPMC12228731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.