ArticleScientific reports2025
Fouling release coatings reduce colonisation of coral seeding devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing frequency and severity of coral bleaching underscores the need for effective coral reef restoration programs. These initiatives include deploying coral fragments or early recruits (spat), with large-scale coral seeding success dependent on improving coral survival by minimizing competition from algae and benthic invertebrates. This study presents a proof-of-concept field experiment assessing the effectiveness of two commercial non-biocidal fouling release coatings (FRCs) and an FRC wax coating in reducing fouling on coral seeding devices. Ceramic devices treated with FRCs were deployed with Acropora millepora microfragments and monitored over 46 weeks. Coated devices experienced significantly less fouling than uncoated controls, particularly during the critical early months when coral spat are most vulnerable. The best performing coating maintained over 10 times more clear surface area than uncoated devices, providing sustained protection without affecting coral survival. Corals also successfully overgrow the coatings by trial's end. These findings suggest that FRCs could protect smaller coral spat from overgrowth, reducing early mortality until they reach a size escape threshold. Such coatings also hold promise for large-scale restoration projects, coral nurseries, and aquaculture. Future research should evaluate their efficacy across diverse habitats, particularly areas with high macroalgal cover, to optimize their application in restoration strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.