Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40617902›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Earliest evidence of Neanderthal multifunctional bone tool production from cave lion (Panthera spelaea) remains.

Grégory Abrams, Patrick Auguste, Stéphane Pirson, Isabelle De Groote, Éva Halbrucker, Kévin Di Modica, Camille Pironneau, Tristan Dedrie, Carlo Meloro, Valentin Fischer and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Palaeoproteomic Deconvolution of Physical and Genetic Collagen Mixtures.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Grégory AbramsArcheOs, Research Laboratory for Biological Anthropology, Ghent Archaeological Sciences Centre, Department of Archaeology, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. gregory.abrams@ugent.be.
Patrick AugusteCNRS, University Lille UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paléo, 59000, Lille Cedex, France.
Stéphane PirsonDirection Scientifique et Technique, Agence Wallonne du Patrimoine, 5100, Namur, Belgium.
Isabelle De GrooteArcheOs, Research Laboratory for Biological Anthropology, Ghent Archaeological Sciences Centre, Department of Archaeology, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. i.e.degroote@ljmu.ac.uk.
Éva HalbruckerPrehistory Research Group, Department of Archaeology, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Kévin Di ModicaScladina Cave Archaeological Centre, Espace muséal d'Andenne, 5300, Andenne, Belgium.
Camille PironneauArcheOs, Research Laboratory for Biological Anthropology, Ghent Archaeological Sciences Centre, Department of Archaeology, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Tristan DedrieArcheOs, Research Laboratory for Biological Anthropology, Ghent Archaeological Sciences Centre, Department of Archaeology, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Carlo MeloroResearch Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
Valentin FischerEvolution & Diversity Dynamics Lab, UR Geology, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Hervé BocherensDepartment of Geosciences, Biogeology, University of Tübingen, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Yves VanbrabantGeological Survey of Belgium, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Fabrice BrayUAR 3290 - MSAP - Miniaturisation pour la Synthèse, l'Analyse et la Protéomique, CNRS, University of Lille, 59000, Lille, France.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11Q0H24N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout history, humans have had a complex relationship with lions, both reverencing and fearing them. Interactions between Neanderthals and cave lions (Panthera spelaea) remain poorly documented due to the scarcity of direct evidence. This study examines the selective use of cave lion bones by Neanderthals to determine whether this behaviour was driven by practical, functional, or symbolic factors, through a detailed zooarchaeological analysis. Previous studies highlighted Neanderthals' skinning and butchering of cave lions, yet new discoveries at Scladina Cave (Belgium) offer deeper insights into this relationship. Dated to the end of the Saalian, the faunal assemblage provides the earliest evidence of bone tools crafted from cave lion remains. A tibia was deliberately processed into multifunctional tools, initially serving as an intermediate tool before being repurposed as retouchers. Proteomic analysis applied on the remains, confirmed the specific identification. These findings reveal that Neanderthals not only competed with but actively utilized cave lions for practical purposes, indicating complex ecological and behavioral interactions. Relationships between pre-humans and large predators, rooted in the Middle Pleistocene, suggest a strategic exploitation of carnivore remains. However, opportunistic procurement cannot be entirely ruled out as a potential factor influencing animal choice in tool production. The intentional transformation of lion bones into functional tools highlights Neanderthals' cognitive skills, adaptability, and capacity for resource utilization beyond their immediate survival needs.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesFossilsLionsNeanderthalsTool Use BehaviorAnimalsArchaeologyCaves

Identifiers

PMID40617902
PMCPMC12228739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.