ArticleScientific reports2025
Lung microbiota of patients with ARDS due to coronavirus disease 2019 receiving ECMO.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Crosstalk between the microbiome and the mucosal immunoglobulin A system in the lung, in health and disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- From commensalism to pathogenesis: the hidden role of the respiratory virome.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diversity of the microbiota, which is essential for lower airway homeostasis, is greatly altered in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is the ultimate protective treatment for the lungs of patients with severe ARDS, but little is known about its effect on the lung microbiota of these patients. To evaluate the effect of ECMO on the lung microbiota of ARDS patients, we performed 16S rRNA and fungal ITS1 profiling and shotgun sequencing on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) collected from ARDS patients due to COVID-19. BALF was collected from 13 patients, five of whom underwent ECMO. In all patients, Pseudomonas was the most abundant of the bacteria. The patients with ECMO had more Pseudomonas and more Klebsiella than those without ECMO. The most abundant fungi were unspecified fungi in the patients with ECMO and Emmia lacerata in the patients without ECMO. Alpha diversity of bacteria and fungi did not differ significantly between the two groups. Human betaherpesvirus 5 and human alphaherpesvirus 1 were predominant in all patients, with human betaherpesvirus 5 decreasing over time in the ECMO patients. The patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 receiving ECMO had a different lung microbiota than those not receiving ECMO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.