Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40617848›Full record

ReviewNPJ science of food2025

A perspective by the German NRZ-Authent on information and knowledge management in governmental authorities.

Andreas Hofmann, Jonas Rietsch, Ilka Haase

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ science of food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andreas HofmannNational Reference Centre for Authentic Food, Max Rubner-Institut, Kulmbach, Germany. andreas.hofmann@mri.bund.de.
Jonas RietschNational Reference Centre for Authentic Food, Max Rubner-Institut, Kulmbach, Germany.
Ilka HaaseNational Reference Centre for Authentic Food, Max Rubner-Institut, Kulmbach, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts in the filing and organisation of primary data, despite being a pillar of digital transformation, appear to be less pronounced when it comes to unstructured or text-based data. This situation is contrasted by the demand for knowledge management in organisational units operating at the interface between different stakeholders, including, for instance, governmental authorities. Supporting the specific objectives of our institution, we have developed a central platform that serves as an information management system for food. By providing a flexible infrastructure for the management of text-based information, as well as an interactive and intuitive user interface for application and integration into every-day business, we have implemented a system that facilitates building of a data pool of information relevant for food and feed fraud/authenticity. While transforming the institutional information management within the NRZ-Authent, the platform allows access to the data pool by external partners at national and, potentially, European or international level.

Identifiers

PMID40617848
PMCPMC12228752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.