ArticleNature communications2025
Pressure encryption toward physically uncopiable anti-counterfeiting.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Architecting Anisotropic Force-Responsive Bidirectional High-Contrast Three-Color Fluorescence Switches via Effective Molecular Modulation for High-Security Information Storage.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Multi-Stimuli-Responsive Mechanoluminescent Manganese Halide Toward External-Light-Free Photochemistry.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Buckling-Induced Angular-Switchable Diffraction Images on Polyurethane Film for Optical Encryption and Anti-Counterfeiting.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Piezochromic hydrogels for physically unclonable optical anti-counterfeiting with machine-learning assisted automatic identification.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Pressure-induced emission enhancement through a synergistic effect between suppression of excimer formation and activation of aggregation-induced emission.Chemical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current optical anti-counterfeiting technologies are mainly limited to materials with multicolor emissions, where the encryption method is only through photoexcitation. It brings about a huge risk for counterfeiting once these materials are reproduced. Here, we introduce a robust pressure encryption as the pressure engineering secret key to strengthen current optical anti-counterfeiting technique from pressure-induced emission luminogens. Through loading different pressures, the initially non-emissive 0D hybrid halide (C
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.