Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40617618›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Trends of female authorship in speech-language pathology publications over the last decade.

Sandhya Ganesan, Tatiana Ferraro, Sana Smaoui, Leena Zitoun, Lara Pramanik, Erin Anne Cardman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandhya GanesanThe George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8805-2559
Tatiana FerraroThe George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Sana SmaouiDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait sana.smaoui@ku.edu.kw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6103-7585
Leena ZitounThe George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Lara PramanikThe George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Erin Anne CardmanSpeech, Language & Hearing Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to analyse the speech-language pathology (SLP) literature from 2012 to 2022 and evaluate authorship trends and factors associated with gender disparities. DESIGN AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Authorship across journals published by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) was evaluated. Outcomes collected from each article included the gender of the first and senior authors, author department affiliations, study type, reported funding source and the country of origin. Three sets of linear regression models were explored to determine the probability of male first authorship, of male senior authorship, and of a study being funded.

resultsA total of 2754 articles were identified for inclusion. The majority of the literature was authored by females, with 77% of first authors and 68% of senior authors being female. Studies with a male senior author were shown to be 4.05-4.67 times more likely to have a male first author than with a female senior author. Male senior authors were over-represented relative to their proportion of ASHA membership compared with female senior authors. Male authorship was associated with certain subtopics, including voice, stuttering and motor speech. Funding probability decreased for all authors regardless of gender between 2012 and 2022.

conclusionsImplicit gender bias and societal gender stereotypes lead to a greater number of women in the field of SLP; the same biases and stereotypes often limit the research productivity and academic leadership potential of women in the field. Addressing these biases and stereotypes is vital to move towards gender equity in the field.

Indexed as

AuthorshipPeriodicals as TopicPublishingSexismSpeech-Language PathologyBibliometricsFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsEducation, MedicalResearch DesignSpeech pathology

Identifiers

PMID40617618
PMCPMC12228465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.