ArticleBMJ open2025
Development of an interpretable machine learning model for frailty risk prediction in older adult care institutions: a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study in China.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Risk Models for Frailty Onset in Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Methodological Trends, Model Performance, and Clinical Translation Gap.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Article
- Frailty prediction in patients with chronic digestive system diseases: based on multi-task learning model.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML)-based frailty risk prediction model that combines real-time health data with validated scale assessments for enhanced decision-making and targeted health management in integrated medical and older adult care institutions (IMOACIs) in central China.
designMixed-methods, cross-sectional study.
setting13 IMOACIs across seven cities in Hunan province, central China, from 8 to 16 July 2022.
participantsFive healthcare experts and two data scientists participated in the requirements analysis stage. A total of 586 older adults were included in the assessment data collection stage, and 15 participants (10 healthcare professionals and five data scientists) were involved in the model evaluation stage.
methodsA collaborative requirements analysis involving healthcare professionals and data scientists guided the design of an interpretable frailty risk prediction model. Five machine learning models were developed and evaluated: logistic regression, support vector machines (SVM), random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and a multimodel ensemble approach. Hyperparameter optimisation was performed using stratified fivefold cross-validation with grid search, incorporating class-weighted loss functions to address class imbalance and model-specific regularisation techniques to maximise performance while preventing overfitting. To enhance interpretability, the model incorporated Shapley Additive Explanations. The final model was integrated into a user-facing platform and validated using cross-sectional standardised assessment data collected from 13 IMOACIs. A mixed-methods evaluation approach combined quantitative performance metrics with qualitative user experience assessments.
resultsThe dataset (n=586) was randomly split into training (n=468) and validation (n=118) sets (4:1 ratio). Among models, XGBoost demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.89 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.89 on the training set. On the validation set, the XGBoost model achieved a precision of 0.76, recall of 0.72, F1 score of 0.74, accuracy of 0.83 and AUC of 0.80, outperforming other models. User experience surveys yielded high mean ratings for satisfaction (4.20/5), perceived accuracy (4.20/5), interpretability (4.30/5) and application value (4.10/5). Qualitative analysis of user feedback identified six key themes: practical and application value, performance and data analysis, interpretability and comprehensibility, impact and integration into practice, limitations and areas for improvement, and future development and innovation prospects, highlighting the model's strong potential for practical implementation.
conclusionsThis novel, interpretable ML-based frailty risk prediction model can enhance decision-making in the care of older adults by providing transparent predictions and identifying crucial factors associated with frailty. It establishes a foundation for targeted management and broader ML applications in healthcare systems, such as IMOACIs, particularly in developing regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.