ReviewModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2025
Pitfalls in the Histological Diagnosis of Morphologic Variants of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.
Review in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic Insights into Lobular Breast Cancer Biology and Patient Outcomes: Analysis of the MINDACT Clinical Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Tubular elements in lymph node metastases from lobular carcinomas with or without tubule formation.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Lobular breast cancer and prognosis: what should we tell patients?Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most frequent histological type of breast cancer and the most frequent special type. Disruption of cell-to-cell adhesion, caused most often by E-cadherin loss of function, results in the distinctive histomorphology of ILC, which is characterized by single threads of monotonous, dyscohesive neoplastic epithelial cells infiltrating the breast parenchyma with little or no stromal reaction, referred to as classic ILC. In the past 4 decades, ILC variants that differ from classic ILC with regard to architectural, cytological, and/or nuclear features have been described. The recognition and correct characterization of ILC, including its variant forms, is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and its possible treatment implications. Some ILC variants may be associated with more aggressive clinical behavior compared with classic ILC, independent of standard predictive and prognostic parameters. Additionally, the distinctive biological and clinical features of ILC are increasingly being investigated as therapeutic targets in ILC-tailored clinical trials. In this manuscript, we have undertaken an in-depth review of the current state of knowledge about ILC variants. Evidence gained from molecular analysis of ILC and its microenvironment suggests that ILC variants are biologically distinct from classic ILC. However, this conclusion is undermined by the imprecise histopathological identification of ILC variants. In the absence of standardized and simplified criteria for the diagnosis of ILC, underrecognition of ILC variants may translate into missed opportunities for tailored treatment of ILC patients. Therefore, we propose steps toward the development of a roadmap that will ultimately lead to a more reproducible classification of ILC variants and improve our knowledge of these challenging tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.