ArticleJournal of substance use and addiction treatment2025
Perspectives on medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) access and service delivery among a community sample of people who use opioids in Los Angeles.
Article in Journal of substance use and addiction treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Pilot Study To Integrate Buprenorphine into a Harm-reduction Drop-in-Center in Kampala, Uganda.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- "You don't have the right resources to let it hurt": How structural vulnerabilities shape opioid withdrawal experiences among a community sample of people who inject drugs in Los Angeles, California.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Risk factors for multiple skin abscesses among community-recruited people who inject drugs in Los Angeles, CA, and Denver, CO: a cross-sectional study.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMedications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) such as buprenorphine and methadone are effective in reducing overdoses, drug use, and drug-related harms. Despite the benefits, MOUD is under-utilized among people who use opioids (PWUO) and this access and service delivery gap is more pronounced among community recruited PWUO who experience greater barriers to treatment entry. Limited qualitative studies have explored MOUD service and delivery barriers among this population. To address this gap, our study investigates the MOUD experiences, preferences, perceived benefits, and unmet treatment needs of a community sample of PWUO in Los Angeles.
methodsBetween September 2021-April 2022, qualitative interviews were conducted with PWUO in Los Angeles, California (N = 22) recruited from two community sites. Participants were at least 18 years old and self-reported opioid and injection drug use in the last 30 days. Participants answered questions related to general experiences with MOUD. We followed a thematic analysis approach to identify common themes that emerged from qualitative interview data.
resultsNearly a third of the sample was male (64 %), Hispanic/Latino (64 %), and the majority (73 %) reported an income of less than $1400 in the prior month. Participants reported: 1) hesitance initiating methadone treatment due to stigma 2) initiating MOUD to manage withdrawal and meet self-determined goals 3) comparing buprenorphine and methadone for withdrawal management to determine future treatment plans 4) being able to reduce interactions with the risk environment due to MOUD treatment and 5) recommending expanded MOUD access and improving delivery.
conclusionsOur findings support expanded and low to no barrier access and delivery of MOUD for socially disadvantaged PWUO who receive treatment in community settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.