Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40617397›Full record

ArticleChest2025

The Influence of Hospital Policies on Clinicians' Decisions to Withhold or Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment.

Gina M Piscitello, Edlyn Lopez Wolwowicz, Michael T Huber, Kelly C Vranas, Donald R Sullivan, Katrina E Hauschildt, Patrick G Lyons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gina M PiscitelloDivision of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Pittsburgh, PA; Palliative Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: ginapiscitello@pitt.edu.
Edlyn Lopez WolwowiczDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Michael T HuberDivision of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Miami, FL; Institute of Bioethics and Health Policy, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Kelly C VranasDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Health Services Research & Development Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR.
Donald R SullivanDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Katrina E HauschildtDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Patrick G LyonsDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is considerable variation in clinicians' approaches to decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment (LST) across US hospitals. These differences are not explained by patient preferences alone and are likely influenced by other factors (eg, hospital policies, hospital culture, state laws, medical society guidelines). RESEARCH QUESTION: How do hospital policies influence clinician approaches to decisions to withhold or withdraw LST among patients admitted to an ICU? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with ICU nurses and physicians at 3 geographically diverse hospital systems across the United States between July and October 2024. We asked clinicians about their experiences with, and perceptions of, hospital policies on withholding or withdrawing LST and the relationship between these policies and clinician decision-making in ethically challenging scenarios.

resultsWe interviewed 10 nurses and 8 attending physicians with a median of 5 years (range, 2-36 years) in practice. Clinicians described limited awareness of, and familiarity with, their hospital's policies that addressed withholding or withdrawing LST. Clinicians with knowledge of these policies could identify their location but described barriers to accessing them. Although clinicians perceived hospital policies as helpful in some ways (eg, legal protection, ethical guidance), they viewed them as neither acknowledging nor addressing sociodemographic disparities or clinician value judgments in LST decision-making. Perceptions varied about whether clinicians followed their own hospital policy guidance when making decisions to withhold or withdraw LST.

interpretationOur results show that clinicians lack detailed understanding about their hospitals' policies that address withholding or withdrawing LST and perceive these policies as having limited applicability to clinical practice. These findings suggest that hospital policies may have little influence on clinician behavior in addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw LST in ethically challenging scenarios.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingLife Support CareOrganizational PolicyWithholding TreatmentAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedUnited Statesclinician behaviorhospital policylife-sustaining treatment

Identifiers

PMID40617397
PMCPMC12833480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.