ArticleEndocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists2025
The Experience of Discrimination Impacts Technology Readiness and Psychosocial States of Minoritized Families Living With Type 1 Diabetes: Findings From the BEAD-T1D Pilot Study.
Article in Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to understand the association of perceived discrimination with diabetes technology utilization and psychosocial states in minoritized families with public insurance and pediatric type 1 diabetes.
methodsThe Building the Evidence to Address Disparities in Type 1 Diabetes Pilot (BEAD-Pilot) study engaged parents/guardians of children aged<12 years with type 1 diabetes and public insurance. Parents/guardians were invited to participate in surveys, focus groups, and/or advisory groups. Surveys included validated measures assessing perceived discrimination, psychosocial factors, and diabetes technology acceptance. Data were analyzed via descriptive statistics, group comparisons, and regressions. Through semi-structured interviews, we explored barriers to diabetes technology use and data were coded inductively by a 5-member bilingual group.
resultsDiscrimination correlated with lower diabetes technology acceptance (r = -0.38, P = .05). Higher perceived discrimination was significantly associated with increased depression (β = 0.45, P < .001) and decreased global health (β = -0.27, P = .011). Qualitative data revealed that parents experienced discrimination based on race, ethnicity, and insurance status, often leading to mistrust and reluctance to engage in care.
conclusionsPerceived discrimination appears to be an underexplored but meaningful barrier to diabetes technology utilization. Addressing discrimination in health care and community settings, in addition to access, is essential for closing disparities in diabetes technology utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.