Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616777›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)2025

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for treatment and prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Emma Simpson, Christopher Carroll, Anthea Sutton, Jessica Forsyth, Annabel Rayner, Shijie Ren, Matthew Franklin, Emily Wood

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma SimpsonSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7353-5979
Christopher CarrollSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Anthea SuttonSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2449-2516
Jessica ForsythSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Annabel RaynerSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Shijie RenSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Matthew FranklinSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Emily WoodSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

EMDR Association UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to provide up-to-date clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence investigating eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) for treatment or prevention of adult post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cost-effectiveness studies assessing PTSD symptoms in adults, published since the NICE 2018 guidelines. EMDR was compared with trauma-focused-cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT), waitlist or usual care. Six databases were searched in September 2023. Risk of bias was assessed. Data synthesis included Bayesian meta-analyses of standardized mean differences if sufficient data were available from at least three RCTs. From 2038 records, 17 studies met the eligibility criteria. One modelling-based study reported cost-effectiveness, finding EMDR the most cost-effective intervention compared to 10 others, including TF-CBT. Sixteen RCTs (n = 1031) providing clinical PTSD outcome data were identified. Most studies had small sample sizes, and all but one was at high/moderate risk of bias. Additionally, 13 RCTs from NICE 2018 guidelines contributed to meta-analyses. EMDR treatment was generally of shorter duration with a lower burden on patient time. Meta-analyses found EMDR was statistically significantly better than waitlist/usual care. There was no significant difference in treatment effect between EMDR and TF-CBT, both reported significantly improved PTSD symptoms.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEye Movement Desensitization ReprocessingStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topiceye movement desensitization and reprocessingmeta‐analysispost‐traumatic stress disordersystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40616777
PMCPMC12514334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.