ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Liver transplantation as a new treatment option for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal liver metastases: a review.
Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) has become widespread in recent years owing to advances in the elucidation of its pathogenesis, surgical procedures, and perioperative management. Historically, LT was only performed in patients with end-stage liver disease and certain malignancies, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, but its indications have recently been expanded to include unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). In this review, we discuss the current status and future prospects of LT for these expanded indications. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal liver metastasis have poor prognoses if they cannot be surgically resected. For non-resectable pCCA, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by LT has demonstrated improved survival, particularly under the Mayo Clinic protocol. Furthermore, LT for CRLM has received renewed interest following encouraging results from a Norwegian group showing a 5-year survival rate of > 80% with strict selection criteria. A recent randomized controlled trial further validated LT with chemotherapy as a promising option, demonstrating a significant survival advantage over chemotherapy alone. Both achieved favorable outcomes by implementing strict patient selection criteria and integrating LT as part of a multidisciplinary treatment approach that includes chemotherapy and radiation therapy. As transplant oncology continues to evolve, a multidisciplinary approach integrating transplant surgery, oncology, and hepatology is crucial for refining LT protocols for non-resectable pCCA and CRLM. Ongoing clinical trials and translational research are key to defining the role of LT in this expanding field, potentially establishing it as a standard therapy for selected cases of advanced hepatic malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.