ArticleEndocrine2025
Comparison of different criteria of captopril challenge test for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism.
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe Captopril Challenge Test (CCT) is favored in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) for its simplicity and high patient compliance, yet optimal diagnostic criteria for CCT remain controversial. This study compared the accuracy of different CCT criteria for the diagnosis of PA.
methodsThis study included retrospective and prospective cohorts. High-risk PA patients were enrolled to complete aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) screening, CCT, and the saline infusion test (SIT). SIT was used as the reference standard, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy.
resultsThe retrospective cohort included 871 patients with PA and 464 with EH. The AUC for PAC post-CCT in diagnosing PA was 0.90, significantly higher than that of ARR post-CCT (0.73) or PAC suppression percentage (0.72). The prospective cohort included 134 patients with PA and 162 with EH, showing an AUC for PAC post-CCT of 0.89, significantly higher than that of ARR post-CCT (0.71) or PAC suppression percentage (0.58). Using a PAC post-CCT cutoff of 11 ng/dL for diagnosing PA achieved a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.66 in the retrospective cohort, and a sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.84 in the prospective cohort, respectively.
conclusionPAC post-CCT served as a superior indicator for the diagnosis of PA, with 11 ng/dL recommended as the optimal diagnostic cutoff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40616764What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.