Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616721›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2025

Efficacy and Safety of Deucravacitinib, a Selective, Allosteric TYK2 Inhibitor, by Baseline DMARD Use in a Phase 2 Psoriatic Arthritis Study: A Post Hoc Analysis.

Atul Deodhar, Miroslawa Nowak, June Y Ye, Tom Lehman, Subhashis Banerjee, Philip J Mease

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03881059 (A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Doses of BMS-986165 in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03881059 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Doses of BMS-986165 in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2019 to 2021Enrolled203ConditionsActive Psoriatic ArthritisArmsBMS-986165 Placebo, BMS-986165 Dose A, BMS-986165 Dose B, Ustekinumab, Ustekinumab Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Atul DeodharDivision of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. deodhara@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2130-1246
Miroslawa NowakClinical R&D, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
June Y YeMedical Affairs, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Tom LehmanWW Medical Immunology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Subhashis BanerjeeBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Philip J MeaseDepartment of Rheumatology, Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to evaluate the influence of background conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) use on efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib, a first-in-class, oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

methodsThis phase 2, double-blind trial randomized 203 patients with active PsA 1:1:1 to oral placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg, or deucravacitinib 12 mg once daily for 16 weeks. Patients had failed or were intolerant to ≥ 1 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), glucocorticoid, csDMARD and/or one tumour necrosis factor inhibitor. Patients were not stratified by csDMARD use and were allowed one background csDMARD if used for ≥ 3 months with stable dose for > 28 days prior to day 1; patients could not initiate new csDMARD treatment. This post hoc analysis evaluated the influence of background csDMARD use on efficacy outcomes, which included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 responses and ACR scoring components; Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores; Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Scores (PASDAS); and on safety measures.

resultsBaseline clinical characteristics and disease activity were generally similar among subgroups regardless of csDMARD use. At baseline, 65.0% of patients were taking background csDMARDs and among these 84.1% were taking methotrexate; percentages of methotrexate use were similar across groups. Similar ACR 20 response rates at week 16 were observed with deucravacitinib treatment in patients with vs without baseline csDMARD use compared with placebo (deucravacitinib 6 mg: 57.8% vs 44.0%; deucravacitinib 12 mg: 62.8% vs 62.5%; and placebo: 31.8% vs 31.8%, respectively). Similar responses with deucravacitinib compared with placebo, regardless of background csDMARD use, were observed in individual ACR components, PASI score, and PASDAS. The safety profile of deucravacitinib treatment was similar in patients with and without csDMARD use.

conclusionBackground csDMARD use did not affect the efficacy or safety of deucravacitinib in this phase 2 PsA study. Graphical Abstract available for this article.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov ): NCT03881059.

Indexed as

bDMARDscsDMARDsDeucravacitinibMonotherapyPsoriatic arthritisTYK2Tyrosine kinase 2

Identifiers

PMID40616721
PMCPMC12450178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.