Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616636›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE): a review of tarlatamab in small cell lung cancer.

Ikponmwosa Jude Ogieuhi, Victor Oluwatomiwa Ajekiigbe, Tolu Comfort Oladipo, Adedamola Solomon Oyenuga, Victor Olamiposi Olaiya, Chidera Stanley Anthony, Chinonyelum Emmanuel Agbo, Weam Salih Abdallah, Adewunmi Akingbola, Olanipekun Lanny Ntukidem

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ikponmwosa Jude OgieuhiSiberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russia. Jude.ogieuhi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9465-0089
Victor Oluwatomiwa AjekiigbeLadoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomosho, Nigeria.
Tolu Comfort OladipoAfe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria.
Adedamola Solomon OyenugaLagos State Health Service Commission, Lagos, Nigeria.
Victor Olamiposi OlaiyaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Izhvesk State Medical Academy, Izhevsk, Russia.
Chidera Stanley AnthonyUniversity of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Chinonyelum Emmanuel AgboPharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Weam Salih AbdallahNational University-Sudan, Khartoum, Sudan.
Adewunmi AkingbolaDepartment of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridgeshire Old Trinity Schools, Cambridge, CB2 1TN, UK.
Olanipekun Lanny NtukidemTrinity Health Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti , MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSmall-cell lung cancer remains one of the most aggressive lung malignancies, a neuroendocrine tumor with paraneoplastic features; it often grows centrally in the lung as opposed to peripheral cancers. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is managed by chemotherapy and/or radiation. Due to its aggressive nature and poor prognosis, there is a need for more targeted and effective therapies; hence, the emergence of tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE), shows promise in current clinical trials. This review critically assesses the efficacy of tarlatamab in demonstrating antineoplastic activity. We also assess the safety profile, overall survival rate, progression-free survival, duration of response, and immunogenicity. METHODOLOGY: To conduct this review, a thorough preliminary search was conducted to identify key studies that evaluated the medication at specific doses among patients with small-cell lung cancer.

resultsThe positive and negative outcomes are discussed in this review, along with safety, tolerability, and performance in relapsed and refractory SLCL and biomarker insights. The adverse effects were generally manageable, most occurring during the first treatment cycle. The unique mechanism of action of tarlatamab was described with a comparative analysis with other novel monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapies for managing small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The studies evaluated in this review are not without limitations.

conclusionTarlatamab's use must be evaluated in a more heterogeneous population with different demographics, comorbidities, and a larger patient population. The possibility of combination therapy studies should also be evaluated in future studies to increase the efficacy of tarlatamab.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalLung NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaT-LymphocytesHumansAntibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalLung cancerMalignancyMonoclonal antibodiesRandomized controlled trialsTarlatamab, BiTE

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.