Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616624›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2025

Pouch Revision in Combination with Placement of a MiniMizer Ring as a Revisional Procedure in Patient with Suboptimal Clinical Response or Recurrent Weight Gain After RYGB.

Sophie C van Helmond, Marijn T F Jense, Geert H J M Verkoulen, Evelien De Witte, Pieter P H L Broos, Jan Willem M Greve, Evert-Jan G Boerma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sophie C van Helmond *Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands.
Marijn T F Jense *Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands. m.jense@zuyderland.nl.
Geert H J M VerkoulenZuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands.
Evelien De WitteZuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands.
Pieter P H L BroosZuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands.
Jan Willem M GreveMaastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Evert-Jan G BoermaZuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesBariatric surgery, in particular Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), has been a well proven and effective means of long-term management of severe obesity. However, about 10-35% of patients have a suboptimal clinical response (lowest quartile of weight loss after RYGB surgery) or suffer from recurrent weight gain often resulting in additional surgery. This study investigates the short-term results on weight loss and complications of surgical revision of the pouch in combination with placement of a MiniMizer ring in patients with a suboptimal clinical response or recurrent weight gain after RYGB.

methodsAll patients who underwent pouch revision in combination with placement of a MiniMizer ring in the Zuyderland Medical Center between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Weight, obesity-related complication resolution, and complications were monitored and reported during the follow-up appointments at the Nederlandse Obesitas Kliniek up to 2 years post-revisional surgery.

resultsThirty-six patients were included. These patients had a mean %TWL of 12.3 and 13.5 at 12 and 24 months post-revisional surgery. This resulted in a cumulative %TWL of 28.7 at 24 months after the revisional procedure. Patients with a superior response after the primary RYGB procedure (%TWL ≥ 35) responded better in %TWL post-revisional surgery compared to patients with a suboptimal response after the primary RYGB with a cumulative %TWL of 33.9 and 17.5 respectively. One ring-related complication occurred.

conclusionsPouch revision in combination with placement of a MiniMizer ring appears to be a promising approach for managing patients with a suboptimal clinical response or recurrent weight gain after RYGB. The procedure offers significant additional weight loss with a low complication rate.

Indexed as

Colonic PouchesGastric BypassObesity, MorbidReoperationWeight GainAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossMiniMizerPouch revisionRYGB

Identifiers

PMID40616624
PMCPMC12380964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.