Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616457›Full record

ArticleJournal of interpersonal violence2026

Dyadic Measurement Invariance of the 10-Item Continuum of Conflict and Control Relationship Scale.

Jungsun Go, Annette Ibarra Skeen, Ryan G Carlson, Dalena Dillman Taylor, Sejal M Barden

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interpersonal violence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jungsun GoUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-0775-5290
Annette Ibarra SkeenUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Ryan G CarlsonUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Dalena Dillman TaylorUniversity of North Texas, Denton, USA.
Sejal M BardenUniversity of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) results in many adverse effects on physical, mental, and societal well-being. Research has highlighted the significance of implementing interventions that encourage effective communication and resolution of IPV within couples. Accurately identifying and distinguishing between different forms of IPV is crucial. To recognize different types of IPV, it is important to use reliable IPV screening tools and ensure that both partners share a common understanding of the constructs being assessed. Hence, examining measurement invariance (MI) within a dyadic framework is necessary to establish a reliable tool for screening IPV. The current study examined the dyadic MI of the 10-item Continuum of Conflict and Control Relationship Scale (CCC-RS-10). The CCC-RS-10 measures an individual's sense of physical and reactive aggression, psychological and controlling aggression, and relationship conflict. Utilizing a sample of 613 opposite-gendered couples, we tested MI using confirmatory factor analysis within a dyadic framework. The CCC-RS-10's three-factor model supported configurational, metric, scalar, and residual invariance. Men reported a higher mean of psychological and controlling aggression (

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalIntimate Partner ViolenceModels, PsychologicalPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsAdolescentAdultAgedAggressionFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSexual Partnerscouplesdyadic dataintimate partner violencemeasurement invariancerelationships

Identifiers

PMID40616457
PMCPMC13139678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.