Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616351›Full record

SynthesisConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026

Insights from equitable governance assessments in conservation areas around the world.

Naira Dehmel, Kate Schreckenberg, Phil Franks, Nikoleta Jones, Francesca Booker, Cosmas Lambini, Ruth Pinto, Alejandra Cely-Gómez, Ishmael Chaukura, Donald Chilengwe Chikumbi and 19 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Insights from equitable governance assessments in conservation areas around the world.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Conservation and environmental management reimagined: Toward anti-oppressive futures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Naira DehmelDepartment of Geography, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9373-549X
Kate SchreckenbergDepartment of Geography, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3666-3792
Phil FranksInternational Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.
Nikoleta JonesInstitute for Global Sustainable Development, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Francesca BookerInternational Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.
Cosmas LambiniInternational Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3642-836X
Ruth PintoInternational Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.
Alejandra Cely-GómezGIZ, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1352-5792
Ishmael ChaukuraCommunity Campfire Association of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Donald Chilengwe ChikumbiDepartment of Governance, The Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia.
Phanith ChouFaculty of Development Studies, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0003-2910-2222
Ioli ChristopoulouThe Green Tank, Athens, Greece.
Retche P ColegadoSocial Sciences Department, Bukidnon State University, Malaybalay, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-4543-2689
Juliana EcheverriGIZ, Bogotá, Colombia.
Emelda Miyanda HachoofweDepartment of Governance, The Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0002-7756-2306
Kalyan HouRECOFTC, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Corinne Samantha JulieNature Seychelles, Roche Caiman, Seychelles.
Reuben LendiraSera Wildlife Conservancy, Samburu County, Kenya.
Rodgers LubiloConservation Coalition Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Bertille MayenGIZ, Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID 0009-0006-8196-9690
Joyce Nyaruai MbataruKenya Wildlife Conservancies Association, Nairobi, Kenya.
Teresa MoralesConservación Amazónica - ACEAA, La Paz, Bolivia.
Nguyen Viet DungWWF Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Vincent Oduka OluochKenya Wildlife Conservancies Association, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jean-Aimé Razafindra-PaulIndependent, Menabe, Madagascar.
Natalie J RobinsonGunung Palung Orangutan Conservation Program, West Kalimantan, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-1994-1866
Constance M SchéréDepartment of Geography, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2084-0333
Samwel ShabaHoneyguide, Arusha, Tanzania.
Medard TwinamatsikoDepartment of Environment and Livelihood Support Systems, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-8693-3925

Funding

UKRI-ESRC London Interdisciplinary Social Science Doctoral Training Programme ES/P000703/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global policy commitments to ensure that protected and conserved areas (PCAs) are equitably governed have increased interest in empirically assessing and analyzing social equity. Although numerous assessments have been conducted in individual PCAs, there is limited empirical insight into equity as a multidimensional concept beyond the site level. We investigated the distributional, procedural, and recognitional equity challenges associated with the governance of PCAs and determined whether the identified challenges differed according to governance type and actor group. We conducted a meta-level analysis of equitable governance assessments conducted at 37 PCAs in 19 countries that form part of the new SAGE (Site-level Assessment of Governance and Equity) database. SAGE is a participatory tool for site-level actors to systematically discuss and assess equity dynamics at their PCAs. We found a large variation in assessment results across the sites. Mitigating the negative impacts of conservation on local communities was most often identified as the biggest challenge. In general, equity assessments tended to be slightly more positive for PCAs governed by and with Indigenous Peoples and local communities than those governed purely by government agencies. Evaluations of different actors often revealed substantial differences in opinion on specific governance issues. In particular, evaluations of PCA decision-makers tended to be more positive than those of PCA users. As an early-stage exploration of the growing SAGE database, our findings provide proof of concept that tools for assessing and improving PCA governance gain value from taking multidimensional approaches and need to consider different actors' views. Although the growing SAGE database holds potential for further insights on how equity is perceived across governance types, ecosystems, and geographical regions, the primary objective of SAGE needs to remain understanding and advancing equity at the site level.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural Resourcesarea‐based conservationáreas protegidasconservación basada en el áreaequidad socialjusticejusticiakunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity FrameworkMarco Mundial Kunming‐Montreal de la Diversidad Biológicaprotected areassocial equity

Identifiers

PMID40616351
PMCPMC12856824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.