ArticlePhysiological reports2025
Flow transport and not ejection fraction determines blood stasis in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Flow transport and not ejection fraction determines blood stasis in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function is a risk factor for intraventricular thrombosis and cardioembolism. However, below a given threshold, LV ejection fraction (EF) poorly predicts these events, suggesting the existence of additional sources of variability. We introduce queue models of LV blood transit connecting flow component analysis and residence time (RT) mapping. These models yield closed-form expressions for the average RT of blood in the LV as a function of (1) EF, (2) direct flow (DF), and (3) residual volume (RV). Models' performance was tested against RT obtained from vector flow mapping in 332 subjects, including controls and patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hypertrophic (HCM), and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Queue models show RT is increasingly sensitive to DF as EF decreases, contradicting the traditional view of large DF as a teleological advantage. Instead, RT is minimized when blood transits in a first-in-first-out (FIFO) manner, while DF short-circuits the FIFO pattern, prolonging RT for other flow components. FIFO models showed a good performance in assessing RT in the studied subjects. Our results show that large DFs increase blood stasis when EF is low. These models also explain why EF is a poor marker of the risk of intraventricular thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.