ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2025
'We Did the Very Best We Could for the Residents': A Thematic Analysis of Work Experience in Swedish Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 'We Did the Very Best We Could for the Residents': A Thematic Analysis of Work Experience in Swedish Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to deepen our understanding of how Swedish nursing staff experienced work in nursing homes (NHs) for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsAn inductive qualitative design with an experiential focus was employed. Data were collected through interviews and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The participants were employed at five NHs located in four municipalities and comprised two registered nurses, eight licensed practical nurses, and one licensed practical nurse trainee. ETHICAL ISSUES AND APPROVAL: This study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Participation was voluntary, and all participants provided their written informed consent.
resultsThe analysis resulted in two themes: A crucible of pressure and uncertainty and Being there for one another. The first theme described an intertwined experience of pressure and uncertainty, with heightened workloads, increased responsibility, frequent changes and elevated risk. Leadership and organisational factors played significant roles and could either exacerbate or alleviate experiences of pressure and uncertainty. The second theme described the willingness and effort of nursing staff to support one another and the residents. It included recognising one another's situations, showing empathy, and providing help. Experiences of distress were evident in both themes and included stress, worry and guilt.
conclusionsThese findings add to existing knowledge of the experience of nursing staff in NHs in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic. They highlight a distressing situation as well as a sense of community. Additionally, the findings emphasise the importance of supportive leadership and clear directives, which can inform future policy and practice in similar situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.