Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616154›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex on short-term balance acquisition in healthy individuals.

Ömer Burak Tor, Michael A Nitsche, Edmund Wascher, Nevin A Guzel, Charles S Layne

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ömer Burak TorDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Balıkesir University, Çağış Campus, Balıkesir, Türkiye. omerburaktor@gmail.com.
Michael A NitscheDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystraße 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany. nitsche@ifado.de.
Edmund WascherDepartment of Ergonomics, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Nevin A GuzelDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Charles S LayneDepartment of Health and Human Performance, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary motor cortex (M1) is central to motor learning processes, and an increasing number of studies have suggested its role in balance control. However, the specific role of M1 in balance control remains unclear, and a causal contribution to improvements in balance ability after balance training has not yet been proven. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that modifies brain activity and enables to probe the involvement of M1 in balance learning. The current study aims to explore the role of M1 in the acquisition of balance skills by applying tDCS during short-term perturbation-based balance training.

methodsThirty-four participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving balance training combined with tDCS: anodal tDCS, sham tDCS, and a control group without stimulation. All participants were involved in a structured, three-session perturbation-based balance training program completed within one week. During these sessions, the assigned tDCS protocol was applied over the M1 leg area concurrently with the training sessions. We analyzed electroencephalography (EEG) and balance ability during balance perturbations and changes in cortico-spinal excitability at rest. Balance perturbations were applied by translating the standing surface forward and backward. An acoustic signal was given two seconds before perturbation in an additional condition to reveal the effect of perturbation anticipation on reactive cortical responses.

resultsThe results indicate that balance ability, measured by center of mass (COM) displacement and joint excursions, was improved in forward perturbation across all groups, with the anodal stimulation group showing the largest improvement relative to baseline performance following training. Moreover, the anodal stimulation group showed a significant decrease in alpha band power following forward perturbations compared to baseline values after training. N1 latency was reduced across all participants in both perturbation directions after training. However, only the anodal stimulation group showed a significant reduction in backward perturbations compared to baseline values. While training did not induce any significant change in short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) measured by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), it increased intracortical facilitation (ICF) in the right tibialis anterior (TA) muscle across all groups, independent of the stimulation condition.

conclusionsThis study provides evidence that tDCS over the M1 area facilitates balance skill acquisition, possibly by facilitating motor preparation and execution and improving the efficiency of sensorimotor integration processes, as shown by decreased alpha power and N1 latency. These findings may have implications for the potential use of tDCS in improving balance control.

Indexed as

LearningMotor CortexPostural BalanceTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleYoung AdultBalance learningBalance trainingElectroencephalographyPostural perturbationsPrimary motor cortexTranscranial direct current stimulationTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40616154
PMCPMC12232060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.