Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616139›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2025

Anabolic-androgenic steroid testing as a tool for consumer engagement and harm reduction: a sequential explanatory mixed-method study.

Timothy Piatkowski, Ross Coomber, Cameron Francis, Emma Kill, Geoff Davey, Sarah Cresswell, Alan White, Madeline Harding, Karen Blakey, Steph Reeve and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Timothy PiatkowskiSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt Campus, Gold Coast, QLD, 4122, Australia. t.piatkowski@griffith.edu.au.
Ross CoomberDepartment of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Cameron FrancisThe Loop Australia, Brisbane, Australia.
Emma KillGriffith Centre for Mental Health, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Geoff DaveyQueensland Injectors Health Network, Brisbane, Australia.
Sarah CresswellSchool of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Alan WhiteThe Loop Australia, Brisbane, Australia.
Madeline HardingThe Loop Australia, Brisbane, Australia.
Karen BlakeyThe Loop Australia, Brisbane, Australia.
Steph ReeveSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt Campus, Gold Coast, QLD, 4122, Australia.
Brooke WaltersQueensland Injectors Voice for Advocacy and Action, Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia.
Cheneal PuljevićThe Loop Australia, Brisbane, Australia.
Jason FerrisThe Loop Australia, Brisbane, Australia.
Monica J BarrattThe Loop Australia, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnabolic-androgenic steroid (AAS) use is widespread, yet regulation remains limited, exposing consumers to misidentified and contaminated products. This study expands AAS testing by enhancing purity analysis, identifying branding inconsistencies, and examining consumer responses. It aims to evaluate the impact of enhanced testing and feedback on consumer behaviour and harm reduction.

methodsThis is a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study incorporating chemical analysis of community-submitted AAS samples and interviews with participants. Interviews used semi-structured formats, focusing on participants' understanding of the testing results, and how it influenced their AAS usage decisions. We sampled from community harm reduction organisations across two drug checking sites in Queensland, Australia.

resultsBetween April 19 and August 16, 2024, 58 AAS samples were submitted. Chemical analysis was conducted using Radian-ASAP direct mass spectrometry and Orbitrap Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry to verify the identity and dosage of the submitted AAS. Of the 46 analysable samples, 9 exhibited presence issues (i.e., the compound differed from expectations), while 15 demonstrated purity issues (i.e., the concentration was either too low or too high). Twenty-five AAS consumers were interviewed, with follow-up interviews conducted with 15 participants to assess their behaviour changes. Interviews (N = 40) indicated that consumers' trust in the substances they used was reduced, leading to more cautious approaches and reconsideration of usage practices.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that chemical analysis can be a powerful tool in influencing AAS consumers' practices, highlighting the need for further research on how testing, coupled with harm reduction interventions, can improve consumer safety and decision-making.

Indexed as

Anabolic AgentsAndrogensConsumer BehaviorHarm ReductionSubstance Abuse DetectionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQueenslandYoung AdultAnabolic AgentsAndrogensAnabolic-androgenic steroidsDrug checkingHarm reductionImage and performance enhancing drugsSteroid checking

Identifiers

PMID40616139
PMCPMC12231991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.