ArticleTrials2025
Effects of device-assisted practice of activities of daily living in a close-to-normal pattern on upper extremity motor recovery in individuals with moderate to severe stroke: study protocol of a randomized control trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04077073 (Effects of Device-assisted Practice of Activities of Daily Living in a Close-to-normal Pattern on Upper Extremity Motor Recovery in Individuals With Moderate to Severe Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Device-assisted Practice of Activities of Daily Living in a Close-to-normal Pattern on Upper Extremity Motor Recovery in Individuals With Moderate to Severe Stroke
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a Structured Robot-Assisted Ankle-Foot Sensorimotor Training Program Versus Manual Training in Chronic Stroke: Protocol for an Assessor-Blinded, Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Sensor-Based Upper-Limb and Hand Exoskeletons for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Technical and Biomedical Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Minimum Detectable Change and Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Box and Block Test and Fugl-Meyer Assessment in Moderate to Severe Chronic Stroke.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe majority of individuals with chronic stroke have residual upper extremity (UE) disability which they cite as their greatest barrier to recovery. Using orthoses, robotic devices, and functional electrical stimulation (FES) represent rehabilitation techniques that have demonstrated the ability to improve arm and hand function in the chronic stroke population, but individuals with more severe impairments are typically not eligible for these studies. The very few studies incorporating these techniques with the severely impaired population do not utilize volitional FES control or modulated loading, which has been shown to promote greater motor recovery and functional improvement. An UE intervention utilizing an advanced orthosis incorporating volitionally controlled FES and robotically modulated shoulder abduction (SABD) loading may provide a pathway to improved coordinated use of the arm and hand for the more severely impaired chronic stroke population.
methodsIn a double-blinded, two-baseline, randomized control trial individuals with chronic moderate to severe stroke resulting in UE hemiparesis will participate in a task-based reaching-grasping-retrieving-releasing (GR3) intervention three times a week for 8 weeks. An anticipated 60 individuals will perform a repeated GR3 task with the ReIn-Hand device (ReIn-Hand), a customized forearm/hand orthosis integrating volitionally controlled FES, to assist with paretic hand-opening. Participants will be randomly assigned to a control group (ReIn-Hand only) or experimental group which will also receive modulated SABD loading via the PACT3D robot. Groups will be compared by (1) their change in function primarily measured by the Box and Blocks Test; (2) change in performance measured by kinematic analysis of reaching and hand-opening and (3) changes in neural motor recovery measured using electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DISCUSSION: The present study will evaluate the effectiveness of a novel interventional device, with and without shoulder abduction assistance, as part of a task-specific training protocol with the moderate to severe chronic stroke population. The focus on the more impaired chronic stroke population provides the opportunity to improve the rehabilitation of this overlooked population. Functional and structural measures using advanced imaging techniques offer the possibility to further delineate recovery and compensation at the neuronal level.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04077073. Registration date: September 04, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.