Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616110›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Do pregnant people have opportunities to participate in clinical trials? an exploratory survey of NIHR HTA-funded trialists.

Rebekah Burrow, Lisa Hinton, Mike Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebekah BurrowNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lisa HintonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mike ClarkeQueen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland. m.clarke@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2926-7257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant people are often excluded from clinical trials, primarily due to safety concerns. However, exclusion causes population-level harms as well as sometimes providing individual protection. Harms caused to pregnant people by exclusion from clinical trials have been clearly evidenced and highlighted during the COVID pandemic. The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) has since provided guidance on improving inclusion of under-served groups, which includes pregnant people, in clinical research. Appropriate inclusion and active facilitation to participate are required to provide equitable evidence-based healthcare during pregnancy and to comply with ethical principles for research.

methodsWe carried out an exploratory, online, cross-sectional survey of trialists to assess whether, why, and how pregnant people are included or excluded from clinical trials funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme, with awards starting in 2022-2023. Trialists were the respondents, with trials the primary focus of this survey. Invitations were sent to trialists between October 2023 and March 2024. Summary statistics were calculated to describe the characteristics of the trials and respondents, to describe eligibility of pregnant people, reasons for this, and how this eligibility is documented and implemented.

resultsWe identified 120 trials of which 88 were eligible for this survey. Responses were received for 81 trials. Pregnant people are excluded from 34 of these 81 trials. Pregnant people are eligible for inclusion in 40 of the 81 trials, including four which partially exclude people during pregnancy. Eligibility is unclear for seven trials. Exclusions are mostly for safety reasons. Sponsors and regulatory authorities are unnecessary barriers to inclusion in some trials. Eight trials of 40 trials make explicit or deliberate attempts to include people during pregnancy.

conclusionsA minority of the 120 trials include people during pregnancy. Most trials for which pregnant people are eligible do not report explicitly including people during pregnancy or facilitating their inclusion. A small number of trials, different in setting, clinical area, and intervention type, are intentionally designed and conducted in a way that include people during pregnancy. There are clear opportunities to improve the inclusion of pregnant people in clinical trials in the NIHR HTA Programme.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPatient SelectionPregnant PeopleTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalAdultCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesClinical trialsHTAInclusionPregnancySurvey

Identifiers

PMID40616110
PMCPMC12232068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.