Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616102›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Machine learning-based predictive tools and nomogram for in-hospital mortality in critically ill cancer patients: development and external validation using retrospective cohorts.

Kaier Gu, Saisai Lu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaier GuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Shaoxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Saisai LuDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China. lusaisai0505@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and the corresponding mortality rates among cancer patients are both high. However, the existing scoring systems all lack specificity. This research seeks to establish and validate a prediction model for early forecasting of in-hospital mortality in critically ill cancer patients.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing data from cancer patients obtained from the eICU and MIMIC-IV databases. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was employed to screen predictive factors and construct six machine learning (ML) models. These models were mainly compared in terms of their predictive performance through area under the curve (AUC) and underwent external validation. Nomograms were developed using multivariate logistic regression (LR) analysis findings. The Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed to explain the variables within the ML models.

resultsTwelve predictive factors were chosen to develop the ML models. Among these models, the LR model and the eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB) model demonstrated the optimal efficacy. In the external validation cohort, their AUC values reached 0.751 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.735 - 0.768] and 0.737 (95% CI: 0.720 - 0.754), respectively. Moreover, nomograms and SHAP were employed to explain the variables. Additionally, a user-friendly web-based calculator tool was created.

conclusionsThe LR and XGB models were successfully developed to predict in-hospital mortality in critically ill cancer patients. Their robust predictive ability was demonstrated in the external validation cohorts. This model can assist physicians in clinical decision-making and timely intervention. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessHospital MortalityMachine LearningNeoplasmsNomogramsAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCancerIn-hospital mortalityIntensive care unitMachine learningMalignancyPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40616102
PMCPMC12231625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.