Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616096›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2025

The reprogramming impact of SMAC-mimetic on glioblastoma stem cells and the immune tumor microenvironment evolution.

Qiong Wu, Jianan Chen, Anders E Berglund, Dongliang Du, Robert J Macaulay, Arnold B Etame

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cancers · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiong WuDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Jianan ChenDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Anders E BerglundDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Dongliang DuDepartments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Robert J MacaulayDepartments of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Arnold B EtameDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. arnold.etame@moffitt.org.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI John L. Cleveland · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Targeting Malignant Reprogramming of Glioblastoma Stem Cells Through Dual Inhibition of S6K1 and BIRC3R01NS135220 · NINDS · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI Arnold Etame · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS135220NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS135220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrinsically resistant glioma stem cells (GSCs) in the setting of a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) remain the most predominant phenomenon leading to unfavorable therapeutic outcomes in glioblastoma (GBM). Hence there is an unmet need for novel anti-GBM therapeutic paradigms that can effectively target GSCs while simultaneously reprogramming the TME.

methodsIn this study, we leverage evidence from SMAC mimetic screening to evaluate and characterize the anti-tumor and immune TME modulating impacts of the lead SMAC mimetic Xevinapant at the single cell level in GBM. We utilized viability assays and orthotopic human and murine GBM models to assess the survival impacts of Xevinapant on GSCs in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, we employed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to investigate the modulation impact of Xevinapant on GBM TME. Lastly, we investigated drug combination synergies to address potential mechanisms of tolerance or resistance to Xevinapant.

resultsAccording to our observations, in vitro exposure to Xevinapant induced apoptosis along with significant viability reduction in a dose-dependent manner, in both human and mouse GSCs. Moreover, Xevinapant treatment produced robust anti-tumor effects in vivo and significantly prolonged animal overall survival. Based on single-cell RNA seq analysis, Xevinapant did not only enhance GSCs apoptosis but also activated antitumor effector immune response leading to favorable reprogramming of immunosuppressive TME. Furthermore, we established and queried Xevinapant therapeutic signatures to the LINCS database in an effort to identify small molecules that could reverse treatment-induced tolerance to Xevinapant. We have identified a novel set of candidate small molecules with robust synergy when combined with Xevinapant.

conclusionsIn summary, Xevinapant exhibits robust anti-tumor activity on GSCs and favorable immune modulation of the TME in GBM, hence providing a rationale for further clinical investigation in GBM.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaNeoplastic Stem CellsTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsApoptosisCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceXenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Identifiers

PMID40616096
PMCPMC12231904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.