Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616094›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2025

Family presence policy and waiting room conditions in Japanese intensive care units: A multicentre questionnaire survey.

Kasumi Shirasaki, Kaori Shimazu, Shinsuke Hashiuchi, Toru Hifumi, Masaki Okajima, Norio Otani

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kasumi ShirasakiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan. r9666ks2happiness@yahoo.co.jp.
Kaori ShimazuDepartment of Nursing, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuo- ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.
Shinsuke HashiuchiDepartment of Nursing, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuo- ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.
Toru HifumiDepartment of Emergency and General Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Masaki OkajimaDepartment of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, 920-8640, Japan.
Norio OtaniDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter the strict visitation restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic, the value of family presence has been re-emphasized as an essential part of patient- and family-centred care in the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to investigate the status of family presence policies and waiting room conditions in Japanese ICUs.

methodsA cross-sectional survey of 292 hospitals certified as tertiary medical centres in Japan was performed using a combination of postal and web-based questionnaires. This included 12 questions about institutional characteristics, family presence policies, and waiting room facilities.

resultsOf the 292 tertiary medical centres contacted, 151 (51.7%) responded. Of these, 120 institutions (79.5%) restricted family visiting hours, typically limited to several hours in the afternoon and limited the number of family members at the same time. These restrictions were often relaxed in cases of sudden clinical deterioration or near the end of the patient's life. In addition, 144 institutions (95.4%) had family waiting rooms for ICUs, and most provided Table (76.4%) and chairs (96.5%). However, only a few offered amenities such as books and magazines (13.9%), napping areas (10.4%), cooking facilities (3.5%), shower rooms (2.1%), or refrigerators (0.7%). Moreover, only 47 institutions (32.6%) ensured adequate privacy in their waiting rooms. There were no significant differences in the family presence policies or waiting room conditions depending on the number of ICU beds, except for the location of the family waiting room.

conclusionsMost ICUs in Japan restricted family visiting hours to several hours in the afternoon and limited the number of family members at the same time. Moreover, family waiting rooms often lack essential amenities and do not sufficiently protect privacy.

Indexed as

COVID-19FamilyIntensive Care UnitsOrganizational PolicyVisitors to PatientsCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleHumansJapanSurveys and QuestionnairesCritical careFamilyIntensive care unitPost-intensive care syndromeQuestionnaireWaiting room

Identifiers

PMID40616094
PMCPMC12228183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.