Observational studyHealth and quality of life outcomes2025
Predicting Quality of Life in People Living with HIV: A Machine Learning Model Integrating Multidimensional Determinants.
Observational study in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health-related quality of life in people living with HIV on first-line INSTI versus those switched from EFV to INSTI: a cross-sectional study from four cities in China.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven prediction and interpretation of central line-associated bloodstream infections in ICU: insights from the MIMIC-IV database.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWith survival steadily improving among people living with HIV(PLWH), quality of life (QoL) has emerged as the ultimate benchmark of therapeutic success. We therefore aimed to develop and validate machine learning models that predict QoL trend in PLWH, identifying key determinants to inform personalized interventions and optimize long-term well-being.
methodsIn this longitudinal observational study, PLWH were recruited from March 2024 to December 2024. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected, and the 31-item WHOQOL-HIV BREF was adopted as the QoL measure. The symptom experience was assessed using the Self-Report Symptom Scale (SRSS). All variables were incorporated into machine learning models to develop predictive algorithms.
resultsThis study included 676 eligible participants with HIV in the cohort. The Gaussian Process (GP) model demonstrated the highest testing AUC of 0.811 and 0.815 in the training dataset. The GP model excels in metrics such as accuracy, AUC, recall, precision, F1 score, Kappa, MCC, Log Loss, and Brier score. In the decision curve analysis (DCA), the five machine learning models exhibited similar net benefits over a broad range of threshold probabilities (ranging from 0.2 to 0.8) compared to the Random Forest (RF) model. The GP and the MLP showed enhanced net benefits at intermediate to high threshold probabilities (30 ~ 60%). The SHAP technique identified the top four predictors of QoL, ranked by importance, with symptom burden being highlighted as the most critical predictor variable.
conclusionsThe machine-learning model, predominantly a GP model, demonstrated the better predictive performance among the six models evaluated, for detecting the QoL predictor in PLWH, indicating that symptom burden influences QoL level. Our findings highlight a non-linear relationship between ART duration and QoL, with diminished well-being during mid-treatment (6 ~ 10 years) linked to treatment fatigue and cumulative toxicities, emphasizing the necessity of dynamic psychosocial support and tailored interventions to sustain long-term QoL in HIV care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.